The raw NMR spectra were first processed using NMRPipe [27 (link)] and the peaks were subsequently picked using Sparky's [28 ] automatic peak picking program. The resulting "raw" peak lists were copied and pasted to the processing view of MetaboMiner. Both peak processing and compound identification were performed using MetaboMiner's default parameter sets. The reference library used for the synthetic mixtures was the biofluid (common) library. For plasma data, the plasma (common) library was used. To assess the degradation in performance assuming no prior knowledge of the sample source (urine, plasma, cell extract or generic biofluid) the complete spectral reference library (223 compounds for TOCSY, 502 compounds for HSQC) was also used to identify compounds. To assess the performance of the web-servers that support 2D NMR mixture analysis – the HMDB [23 (link)], the MMCD [25 (link)], the BMRB [24 (link)], and the SpinAssign [29 ] of PRIMe
Benchmarking 2D NMR Metabolomics Identification
The raw NMR spectra were first processed using NMRPipe [27 (link)] and the peaks were subsequently picked using Sparky's [28 ] automatic peak picking program. The resulting "raw" peak lists were copied and pasted to the processing view of MetaboMiner. Both peak processing and compound identification were performed using MetaboMiner's default parameter sets. The reference library used for the synthetic mixtures was the biofluid (common) library. For plasma data, the plasma (common) library was used. To assess the degradation in performance assuming no prior knowledge of the sample source (urine, plasma, cell extract or generic biofluid) the complete spectral reference library (223 compounds for TOCSY, 502 compounds for HSQC) was also used to identify compounds. To assess the performance of the web-servers that support 2D NMR mixture analysis – the HMDB [23 (link)], the MMCD [25 (link)], the BMRB [24 (link)], and the SpinAssign [29 ] of PRIMe
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Alberta, National Institute for Nanotechnology
Protocol cited in 8 other protocols
Variable analysis
- PH conditions
- Synthetic mixtures (3)
- Plasma sample
- TOCSY (6) and HSQC (6) 2D NMR experiments
- Metabolite concentrations (ranging from 0.1 to 60 mM)
- Metabolites identified (27, 21, 24, and 35)
- Sample preparation (filtering, lyophilizing, re-dissolving)
- NMR conditions (800 MHz and 500 MHz, 25°C)
- TOCSY (wgtocsy) and HSQC (gChsqc) pulse sequences
- TOCSY (spectral width, mixing time, transients, acquisition time, relaxation delay)
- HSQC (spectral widths, transients, acquisition time, relaxation delay, data points)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!