Informed consent from each patient was not required on account of causing unnecessary harm. Supposedly informing these women of their risk of ovarian cancer and OS that they no longer have access to might cause redundant concerns.
Retrospective Study on Bilateral Salpingectomy
Informed consent from each patient was not required on account of causing unnecessary harm. Supposedly informing these women of their risk of ovarian cancer and OS that they no longer have access to might cause redundant concerns.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Radboud University Nijmegen
Other organizations : Catharina Ziekenhuis, Maastricht University, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Rijnstate Hospital, Elkerliek Ziekenhuis
Variable analysis
- No independent variables explicitly mentioned.
- Actual uptake of counseling
- Performance of OS (opportunistic salpingectomy)
- The year 2015 was considered as representative baseline because three large cohort studies were published at that time showing a risk reduction for EOC after bilateral salpingectomy.
- During the study period (2015–2018) national guidelines concerning OS had not been issued in the Netherlands, and the nationwide Stop Ovarian Cancer (STOPOVCA) implementation project had not started.
- No positive or negative controls are explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!