The “signal” stimuli consisted of oriented ( ± 45° from vertical) sinusoidal gratings at six spatial frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 c/d) with random phase. Each grating consisted of eight cycles. The size of gratings was inversely proportional to the spatial frequency (i.e., 16°, 8°, 4°, 2°, 1°, and 0.5°), keeping the number of cycles the same across different spatial frequencies. Pixel intensities of the random “noise” stimuli were sampled from a Gaussian distribution (μ = 0, σ = 0.33). Noise stimuli in each trial were sampled independently. The size of the noise mask was the same as that of the signal grating (Chen et al., 2014 (link)). To minimize edge effects, a half-Gaussian ramp was added around the stimulus.
Dichoptic Contrast Sensitivity Measurement
The “signal” stimuli consisted of oriented ( ± 45° from vertical) sinusoidal gratings at six spatial frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 c/d) with random phase. Each grating consisted of eight cycles. The size of gratings was inversely proportional to the spatial frequency (i.e., 16°, 8°, 4°, 2°, 1°, and 0.5°), keeping the number of cycles the same across different spatial frequencies. Pixel intensities of the random “noise” stimuli were sampled from a Gaussian distribution (μ = 0, σ = 0.33). Noise stimuli in each trial were sampled independently. The size of the noise mask was the same as that of the signal grating (Chen et al., 2014 (link)). To minimize edge effects, a half-Gaussian ramp was added around the stimulus.
Corresponding Organization : University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Variable analysis
- Spatial frequency of the signal stimuli (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 c/d)
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Oriented (± 45° from vertical) sinusoidal gratings as signal stimuli
- Eight cycles per grating
- Size of gratings inversely proportional to spatial frequency (16°, 8°, 4°, 2°, 1°, and 0.5°)
- Gaussian distributed random noise stimuli (μ = 0, σ = 0.33)
- Size of noise mask same as signal grating
- Half-Gaussian ramp around the stimulus to minimize edge effects
- Dichoptic stimuli rendered on a gamma-corrected 3D-ready computer monitor (ASUS VG278HE; refresh rate: 144 Hz; resolution: 1,920 × 1,080 pixels; background luminance: 54 cd/m^2)
- Participants viewed stimuli through polarized glasses
- Viewing distance of 114 cm
- Chin-forehead rest used to secure head position
- Experiments conducted in a dimly lit room (<5 lx)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!