Fecal samples were subjected to microbiota analysis by 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq (PE300) sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) (19 (link)). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were detected with QIIME2 (20 (link)) and grouped according to phylum and genus. Differences in microbiota composition were compared according to relative abundance of these two levels. α-diversity was assessed according to the observed species, Shannon index, and Chao1 index, while β-diversity was assessed by Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac distances. Bray-Curtis distances were also used for ordination by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and differences in composition structure were assessed by Adonis and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) (21 (link)). The multiple response permutation procedure (MRPP) (22 (link)) was based on OTUs. Species with statistically significant differences between groups were evaluated by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (23 (link)). Functional prediction of microbiota differences was performed using Tax4fun (24 (link)) and STAMP (Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles) (25 (link)) using functional inferences from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes (KEGG) database. The abundances of the main butyrate-producing bacteria (Faecalibacterium, Agathobacter, Roseburia, Subdoligranulum, Ruminococcus_gnavus_group, Megasphaera, Phascolarctobacterium, Flavonifractor, Eubacterium_ruminantium_group, Coprococcus, Eubacterium_hallii_group, Oscillibacter, Butyricicoccus, Butyricimonas, Anaerostipes, Odoribacter, Porphyromonas, Eubacterium_ventriosum_group, Oscillospira, and Butyrivibrio) were compared.
Gut Microbiome Profiling in Anti-PD-1 Therapy
Fecal samples were subjected to microbiota analysis by 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq (PE300) sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) (19 (link)). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were detected with QIIME2 (20 (link)) and grouped according to phylum and genus. Differences in microbiota composition were compared according to relative abundance of these two levels. α-diversity was assessed according to the observed species, Shannon index, and Chao1 index, while β-diversity was assessed by Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac distances. Bray-Curtis distances were also used for ordination by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and differences in composition structure were assessed by Adonis and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) (21 (link)). The multiple response permutation procedure (MRPP) (22 (link)) was based on OTUs. Species with statistically significant differences between groups were evaluated by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (23 (link)). Functional prediction of microbiota differences was performed using Tax4fun (24 (link)) and STAMP (Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles) (25 (link)) using functional inferences from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes (KEGG) database. The abundances of the main butyrate-producing bacteria (Faecalibacterium, Agathobacter, Roseburia, Subdoligranulum, Ruminococcus_gnavus_group, Megasphaera, Phascolarctobacterium, Flavonifractor, Eubacterium_ruminantium_group, Coprococcus, Eubacterium_hallii_group, Oscillibacter, Butyricicoccus, Butyricimonas, Anaerostipes, Odoribacter, Porphyromonas, Eubacterium_ventriosum_group, Oscillospira, and Butyrivibrio) were compared.
Corresponding Organization : Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Other organizations : Tsinghua University
Variable analysis
- Anti-PD-1 therapy
- IrAE treatment
- Fecal microbiota composition (phylum and genus levels)
- Alpha-diversity (observed species, Shannon index, Chao1 index)
- Beta-diversity (Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac distances)
- Relative abundance of main butyrate-producing bacteria
- Fecal samples collected before and after interventions
- Fecal samples stored in the Clinical Biobank, Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!