Full eligibility criteria for Study 207626 have been published previously.19 (link) Patients were eligible to participate if they had a post-bronchodilator FEV1 of <50% predicted and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score ≥10 or FEV1 <80% predicted with a documented history of ≥2 moderate exacerbations or ≥1 severe exacerbation (requiring hospitalization) in the previous 12 months and a CAT score ≥10. Patients were required to receive daily maintenance treatment with TIO monotherapy for ≥3 months prior to screening. Data for pooled baseline characteristics, based on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of Study 2076260 (N=800)19 (link) were included in the model (Table 1). The mean age of the study population was 66.2 years and 32% were female.19 (link) Baseline FEV1% predicted was 50.0%.
Model inputs
Total
N=800a
Patient demographics (ITT population Study 207626)
Age, years, meana (SE)b
66.2a (0.3)
Sex, female, %
32.1
BMIc, %
Low
10.9
Medium
60.1
High
29.0
Any CVD comorbidity, %
54.8
Any other comorbidity, %
23.9
History of ≥1 exacerbationd, %
79.3
mMRC score ≥2e, %
48.1
Current smoker, %a
47.6a
Height, cm, mean (SE)b
169.7 (0.3)
Exacerbationsd in previous year, mean
1.4
Moderate exacerbations, mean
1.2
Severe exacerbations, mean
0.2
Baseline SGRQ, mean (SE)b
48.9 (0.6)
Baseline FEV1% predicted, meana (SE)b
50.0a (0.5)
Treatment effects (Study 207626)
Endpoint (12 weeks)
FF/UMEC/VI versus TIO
FEV1 increment, mean (95% CI) mL difference
95.0 (62, 128)
SGRQ change, mean (95% CI) score difference
−3.2 (−5.0, −1.4)
Exacerbation reduction, relative risk
No differencef
Notes: a19 (link) bCalculated as SD/√(N). cLow: <21, medium: ≥21 to ≤30, high: >30. dModerate or severe. eAssumed the same as CAT ≥21. fTreatment effect input on exacerbation reduction was set to “no difference” as the relative risk reduction of exacerbations was not included as an endpoint in Study 207626.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAT, COPD Assessment Test; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FF, fluticasone furoate; ITT, intent-to-treat; mMRC, modified Medical Research Council; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; TIO, tiotropium; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.
Model risk equations include, as covariates, baseline values for age, sex, body mass index, cardiovascular disease and other comorbidities, smoking status, fibrinogen level, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale score, FEV1% predicted, prior exacerbation history, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and height. For parameters that were not available directly from Study 207626 data (ie baseline mMRC, fibrinogen, and 6MWT), estimates were made using risk equations or analogous data collected in the trial. Further details on the methods used to derive values for these parameters are provided in Supplementary Appendix 1.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Kendall R., Martin A.A., Shah D., Shukla S., Compton C, & Ismaila A.S. (2023). Cost-Effectiveness of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus Tiotropium Monotherapy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate-to-Very Severe COPD in the UK. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 18, 1815-1825.
Publication 2023
6 minute walk test Age population Body mass index Bronchodilator Cardiovascular disease Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseDyspnea Eligibility FemaleFibrinogen Fluticasone furoate Forced expiratory volumeHospitalization MeanaPatients RespiratoryTiotropium Umeclidinium Vilanterol
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom), GlaxoSmithKline (United States), McMaster University, Impact
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required