Radiographic Evaluation of Cervical Spine Injuries
For this review, only pretreatment imaging studies were collected and analyzed. Lateral-view radiographs of the cervical spine were used to measure the C2/3 anterior translation and angulation according to the method described by Li et al. and Watanabe et al. (Fig. 1) [10 (link), 15 (link)]. The axial-plane CT scans, sagittal- and coronal-plane reconstructions, and three-dimensional reconstructions were used to look for the posterior vertebral wall (PVW) fracture of C2, which was defined as fracture lines propagating through the posterior wall of the vertebral body of C2 on one or two sides (Fig. 2) [7 (link), 9 (link)]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images acquired in some patients were used to determine if there were spinal cord signal changes, and if so, identify the location and range of the signal changes.
A schematic diagram showing that anterior translation of C2-3 is measured as the distance between lines drawn parallel to the posterior margins of the C3 and C2 bodies at the level of the disc space (a), and angulation of C2-3 is measured as the angle formed by lines drawn along the inferior endplate of the C2–C3 vertebrae (b)
A schematic diagram showing the presence of the posterior vertebral wall (PVW) fracture of C2 on the right side (A) or two sides (B)
Since a significant anterior translation of C2/3 (≥ 3.5 mm) and/or angulation of C2/3 (≥ 11°) were accepted as radiographic evidence for segmental instability, we divided the translation of C2/3 into 50% (≥ 1.8 mm) and 100% (≥ 3.5 mm) of significant translation to help establish the threshold of parameters for neurological deficit, and we also divided the angulation of C2/3 into 50% (≥ 5.5°) and 100% (≥ 11°) of significant angulation [13 (link)]. Then, PVW fractures combined with a different degree of translation of C2/3, as causative factors of neurological deficit, and the presence of PVW fractures and ≥ 1.8 mm and 3.5 mm of C2/3 translation were recorded as PVW fractures combined with 50% and 100% of significant translation, respectively. Similarly, PVW fractures combined with a different degree of C2/3 angulation, as causative factors of neurological deficit, and the presence of PVW fracture and ≥ 5.5° and 11° of C2/3 angulation were recorded as PVW fractures combined with 50% and 100% of significant angulation, respectively.
Li G, & Wang Q. (2023). Analysis of the clinical characteristics and predisposing factors for neurological deficit with Hangman fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18, 179.
Presence of posterior vertebral wall (PVW) fracture of C2
Degree of C2/3 anterior translation (50% and 100% of significant translation)
Degree of C2/3 angulation (50% and 100% of significant angulation)
dependent variables
Presence of neurological deficit
control variables
Lateral-view radiographs of the cervical spine used to measure the C2/3 anterior translation and angulation
Axial-plane CT scans, sagittal- and coronal-plane reconstructions, and three-dimensional reconstructions used to identify the posterior vertebral wall (PVW) fracture of C2
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images used to determine the presence and location of spinal cord signal changes
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required