All patients were followed for at least 6 months. A Bostman score [15 (link)] and extension lag versus the contralateral healthy leg were employed to assess the postoperative knee function of the IPFP patients at 6 months postoperatively. A Bostman score of 28 or higher was considered excellent in regard to the functional recovery of the knee, 20–27 was considered good, and less than 20 was considered poor. The Insall–Salvati ratio [16 (link)] was assessed on the immediate postoperative radiograph. The radiograph outcomes were evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.
Assessing Knee Function after Intrapatella Fracture
All patients were followed for at least 6 months. A Bostman score [15 (link)] and extension lag versus the contralateral healthy leg were employed to assess the postoperative knee function of the IPFP patients at 6 months postoperatively. A Bostman score of 28 or higher was considered excellent in regard to the functional recovery of the knee, 20–27 was considered good, and less than 20 was considered poor. The Insall–Salvati ratio [16 (link)] was assessed on the immediate postoperative radiograph. The radiograph outcomes were evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Yangpu Hospital of Tongji University, Tongji University, Tongji Hospital
Variable analysis
- Fracture side
- Body mass index (BMI)
- Operation time
- Radiation exposure
- Full weight-bearing time
- Bostman score
- Extension lag versus the contralateral healthy leg
- Insall–Salvati ratio
- Radiograph outcomes (anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 1 and 3 months postoperatively)
- All patients were followed for at least 6 months
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!