Two distinct institutional task forces were established to respond to the monkeypox epidemic. One consisted of infectious disease physicians with expertise in epidemiology, antimicrobial stewardship, and HIV care. The second larger task force included collaborators from urgent care and emergency department leadership, healthcare system administration, pharmacy, laboratory services, employee health, ambulatory clinic leadership, information services, and corporate communications. Both groups met at least weekly to develop and implement the care model. Barriers to implementing the care model were identified and key stakeholders engaged to move the project forward (see Figure 1).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Polk C., Sampson M., Fairman R.T., DeWitt M.E., Leonard M., Neelakanta A., Davidson L., Roshdy D., Branner C., McCurdy L., Ludden T., Tapp H, & Passaretti C. (2023). Evaluation of a health system’s implementation of a monkeypox care model under the RE-AIM framework. Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease, 10, 20499361231158463.
No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the given text.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required