The overall sample size in all the risk strata defined according to recurrence score was driven by the need to include a sufficient number of patients with a score of 11 to 25 (midrange risk) in order to test the noninferiority of endocrine therapy alone versus chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy. At the fourth planned interim analysis held on March 20, 2015, the ECOG–ACRIN data and safety monitoring committee recommended that the results of the low-risk group be released and that follow-up in the randomized midrange-risk stratum and the nonrandomized high-risk stratum continue as planned. Although there was no specific enrollment goal for the low-risk group, the large sample provided the opportunity to estimate 5-year event rates accurately. Statistical comparisons of baseline characteristics were calculated with the use of the chisquare test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon test and Student’s t-test for continuous variables. Tumor size in the greatest dimension, histologic grade of the tumor, and expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 were determined locally and reported by the participating site. Event-free rates were estimated with the use of the Kaplan–Meier method, with confidence intervals computed with the use of the log–log transformation and Greenwood’s variance. The data-cutoff date for the results presented here was July 29, 2015.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Other organizations :
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Sunnybrook Hospital, Loyola University Medical Center, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Jacksonville College, Mayo Clinic in Florida, WinnMed, National Institutes of Health, University School, Indiana University, Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Wake Forest University, Northwestern University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Washington University in St. Louis, Baylor College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Allegheny General Hospital, Emory University, The University of Texas at San Antonio, Cancer Trials Ireland, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Cancer Center of Kansas, Fox Valley Technical College, Vanderbilt University, University of Pittsburgh, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Cancer Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, University of Hawaii System, Stanford University, Indiana University Hospital
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required