Vertical Jump Performance Evaluation

CMJ was calculated from flight time, measured by an optical system (Optojump next, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). The students were asked to jump as high as possible with their arms on their hips (akimbo) maintaining the same body position during take-off and landing [42 (link)]. Three jumps were performed interspersed with 30 s of rest, and the best performance was used as a baseline value. CMJ was measured again one minute after the end of the repeated shuttle-sprint running test.

Free full text: Click here

Tsoukos A, & Bogdanis G.C. (2023). Physiological Responses and Fatigue during a Repeated Shuttle-Sprint Running Test in Adolescent Schoolchildren: A Comparison between Sexes and Fatigue Calculation Methods. Children, 10(6), 1041.

Publication 2023

Optojump next

Arms Hips Students

Corresponding Organization : National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Repeated shuttle-sprint running test

dependent variables

Counter-movement jump (CMJ) height

control variables

Students were asked to jump as high as possible with their arms on their hips (akimbo) maintaining the same body position during take-off and landing
Three jumps were performed interspersed with 30 s of rest, and the best performance was used as a baseline value

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!