Trends in Students' Stress Levels

In this study, the trends, discontinuity, and their effect size of SMRPs of male and female middle-school, high-school, and university students from 2007 to 2022 were analyzed by joinpoint regression analysis (JPRA) using the Joinpoint Regression Program version 5.0.2 (National Cancer Institute).^{10 (link),12 (link),31 ,32 (link)} The differences in SMRPs among sexes (male and female students) and schools (middle school, high school, and university) from 2007 to 2022 were compared using linear mixed-effect models with the Scheffe post hoc test using SPSS statistical software for Windows version 27 (IBM).^{11 (link),13 (link)} The detailed statistical methods are described in the eAppendix in Supplement 1. Two-tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Free full text: Click here

Okada M., Matsumoto R., Shiroyama T, & Motomura E. (2023). Suicidal Mortality and Motives Among Middle-School, High-School, and University Students. JAMA Network Open, 6(8), e2328144.

Publication 2023

SPSS statistical software for Windows version 27

Female Male Smrps Students Supplement

Corresponding Organization : Mie University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Sex (male and female students)
School type (middle school, high school, and university)

dependent variables

Trends, discontinuity, and effect size of SMRPs (screen media-related problems)

control variables

Time period (2007 to 2022)

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!