Comprehensive Knee Injury Diagnosis Review

The search terms include population, independent variable, and outcome (online supplemental material 2). Using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategy (PRESS)104 (link) guidelines, a professional health science librarian was consulted to develop and tailor search strategies for each database. Electronic databases Scopus, Embase: Elsevier, PubMed, Web of Science: all databases, and Google Scholar will be searched. Literature published between 1970 and 2022 will be included, covering the period during which clinical knee injury diagnosis was formalised and surgical reparative techniques were popularised.105 106 (link) Primary research studies and grey literature will be included.93 107 108 (link)

Free full text: Click here

Morgan K., Cowburn J., Farrow M., Carter J., Cazzola D., Walhin J.P, & McKay C. (2023). Understanding the role of physical activity on the pathway from intra-articular knee injury to post-traumatic osteoarthritis disease in young people: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 13(3), e067147.

Publication 2023

Embase

Diagnosis Knee injury Peer review Surgical techniques

Corresponding Organization : Versus Arthritis

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Population, independent variable

dependent variables

Outcome

control variables

Control variables not explicitly mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!