We performed a consecutive case study of all patients treated endoscopically for tumors of the clivus, reviewing all patients who received operations via a transnasal endoscopic approach in our neurosurgical department between January 2009 and January 2020. We excluded patients suffering from skull base osteomyelitis or degenerative pathologies such as basilar invagination due to their distinct clinical outcome. Pre- and postoperative data (with description of the surgical technique, EOR, and pre- and postoperative imaging) were retrieved from our records. We reviewed the preoperative goal of the operation (GTR, subtotal resection [STR], tumor debulking, and biopsy); clinical information included occurrence and side of cranial nerve palsy and duration of symptoms. The clinical status before and after operations and in follow-up was assessed according to the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS). If available, preoperative diagnostic imaging included pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the craniovertebral junction.
Extent of Resection (GTR, STR, tumor debulking, biopsy)
Occurrence and side of cranial nerve palsy
Duration of symptoms
Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) before and after operations, and in follow-up
control variables
Patients suffering from skull base osteomyelitis or degenerative pathologies such as basilar invagination
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required