Formative and Summative OSCE Assessment of Head and Skull Examination
At the end of the module, the students who agreed to be videotaped participated in a formative videotaped assessment in the context of an OSCE station. The examination was performed on a standardized patient and was recorded. Afterwards the videos were shown to two examiners who were blinded with regards to the group assignment. They assessed the performance of the students with the standardized checklist (Additional file 2) used for head and skull examinations. The checklist is used in OSCE’s since 2007 and has been described previously [31 ]. The validation process of the checklist has been presented on the annual congress of the DGMKG (german society for cranio-maxillofacial surgeons) in 2009. The examiners were a second year resident (i.e., at the beginning of clinical training) and an attending doctor in the Department of CMF-Surgery. Both examiners rated the video material in an independent manner and assessed the students according to the OSCE checklist. Four months after the skills lab week and the internship, the surgical OSCE took place as an obligatory final exam (summative). Videotaping the entire exam was not possible since all students did not agree to being videotaped. For this reason, two examiners were at the head & skull examination of the OSCE station and rated the students. One examiner was an attending doctor in the Department of CMF-Surgery, the other examiner was an attending doctor in a related surgical discipline. These examiners were not members of the faculty and were also blinded with regards to group assignment. All raters participated in the mandatory examiner training at the faculty, which consists of a 30 min online tutorial and a 30 min simulation of a video rating. Furthermore, we requested the time and the way of preparation the students prepared for the final OSCE exam referring to the head & skull examination, with a structured questionnaire.
Hoefer S.H., Sterz J., Bender B., Stefanescu M.C., Theis M., Walcher F., Sader R, & Ruesseler M. (2017). Conveying practical clinical skills with the help of teaching associates—a randomised trial with focus on the long term learning retention. BMC Medical Education, 17, 65.
Publication 2017
Doctor ExaminationsFacultyHead Internship Maxillofacial surgeons Patient Skull Students Surgical
Corresponding Organization : University Hospital Frankfurt
Other organizations :
University Hospital Magdeburg
Performance of students on the standardized checklist for head and skull examinations
Time and way of preparation the students prepared for the final OSCE exam referring to the head & skull examination
control variables
Use of a standardized checklist (Additional file 2) for head and skull examinations that has been used in OSCE's since 2007 and described previously [31]
Validation process of the checklist presented at the annual congress of the DGMKG (german society for cranio-maxillofacial surgeons) in 2009
Two examiners (a second-year resident and an attending doctor in the Department of CMF-Surgery) who were blinded with regards to the group assignment
Two examiners (an attending doctor in the Department of CMF-Surgery and an attending doctor in a related surgical discipline) who were not members of the faculty and were also blinded with regards to group assignment
All raters participated in the mandatory examiner training at the faculty, which consists of a 30 min online tutorial and a 30 min simulation of a video rating
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required