UKBB Genotyping Protocol

Data acquisition and quality control (QC) have been described.²² (link) Briefly, UKBB participants were genotyped on two similar arrays (95% probe overlap): 438,427 samples (95 batches) were genotyped with the Applied Biosystems UK Biobank Axiom Array (825,927 probes) and 49,950 samples (11 batches) were genotyped with the Applied Biosystems UK BiLEVE Axiom Array by Affymetrix (807,411 probes). All results in this study are based on the human genome reference build GRCh37/hg19.

Free full text: Click here

Auwerx C., Lepamets M., Sadler M.C., Patxot M., Stojanov M., Baud D., Mägi R., Porcu E., Reymond A, & Kutalik Z. (2022). The individual and global impact of copy-number variants on complex human traits. American Journal of Human Genetics, 109(4), 647-668.

Publication 2022

Biobank Axiom Array BiLEVE Axiom Array

Human genome

Corresponding Organization : SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics

Other organizations : University of Tartu

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Genotyping platform (UK Biobank Axiom Array, UK BiLEVE Axiom Array)

dependent variables

Not explicitly mentioned

control variables

Human genome reference build (GRCh37/hg19)

controls

Positive controls: Not specified
Negative controls: Not specified

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!