Pediatric H. pylori Diagnosis Criteria

H. pylori infection was diagnosed by histopathological examination, urea breath test (UBT), fecal HP antigen test (SAT), or rapid urease test; the age was less than 18 years old; there was no restriction in race, sex, and course of disease; patients had no other serious gastrointestinal diseases; the subjects did not use related antibiotics to treat other diseases at the same time.

Free full text: Click here

Liang M., Zhu C., Zhao P., Zhu X., Shi J, & Yuan B. (2023). Comparison of multiple treatment regimens in children with Helicobacter pylori infection: A network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 13, 1068809.

Publication 2023

Antibiotics Antigen Breath test Course of disease Fecal test Gastrointestinal diseases H pylori Infection Patients Urea Urease

Corresponding Organization : Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

None explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

H. pylori infection status (diagnosed by histopathological examination, urea breath test, fecal HP antigen test, or rapid urease test)

control variables

Age (less than 18 years old)
Course of disease
Absence of other serious gastrointestinal diseases
No concurrent use of related antibiotics to treat other diseases

controls

No positive or negative controls explicitly mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!