Qualitative Analysis of Individual and Focus Group Interviews

Data were analyzed using the identical method as in previous studies (van Dusseldorp et al., 2019 (link), 2020 (link)), i.e., Colaizzi's seven-step method (Polit & Beck, 2017 , p. 540), and the MIP (Edward & Welch, 2011 (link); Tables 1 and 2). Participants of the individual interviews are indicated as individual female (IF) or individual male (IM) and participants of the focus group interviews as focus female (FF) or focus male.
Computer software Atlas.ti version 9.1.6. was used to manage and analyze the data.

Free full text: Click here

van Dusseldorp L., Groot M., van Vught A., Goossens P., Hulshof H, & Peters J. (2023). How patients with severe mental illness experience care provided by psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 35(5), 281-290.

Publication 2023

Atlas.ti version 9

Female Male

Corresponding Organization : Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (United Kingdom)

Other organizations : Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Ghent University, Dimence

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Not explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

Not explicitly mentioned

control variables

Not explicitly mentioned

controls

No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!