Validation of ExPEC Virulence Markers
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Technical University of Denmark, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, University of Minnesota, Statens Serum Institut
Protocol cited in 18 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Strains used for validation of 18 singleton genes and genes representing two operons (foc-sfa and afa-dra-daa) in the VirulenceFinder ExPEC database
- Validation of 18 singleton genes and genes representing two operons (foc-sfa and afa-dra-daa) in the VirulenceFinder ExPEC database
- Nine control strains previously classified by multiplex PCR as representing ExPECJJ
- Five control strains with publicly available genomes collected from NCBI
- Two control strains that underwent WGS within this study
- One control strain (L31) that was ultimately excluded
- Strain JJ055 (positive for fimH and ompT) that was replaced by K-12 strain MG1655 as a non-ExPEC negative control
- Nine control strains previously classified by multiplex PCR as representing ExPECJJ
- K-12 strain MG1655 as a non-ExPEC negative control
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!