Screening Cassava Genotypes for CBSV and UCBSV Resistance
Protocol cited in 11 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Cassava genotypes selected from Uganda and Tanzania
- Field resistance to both UCBSV and CBSV
- Virus-free tissue culture plantlets and stakes from CBSD disease-free areas were used as planting material
- All planting material was diagnosed as free of (U)CBSV prior to planting
- Tissue culture plantlets were hardened according to [38]
- Field trials were established in an area with high CBSD and whitefly pressure
- Each plot was separated by a CBSV/UCBSV infected spreader row of TME 204
- Plants of TME 204 used in the spreader rows were obtained from fields with 100% CBSD incidence and a mean severity of 4 and 4.5 for shoot and root necrosis, respectively
- The genotypes were grown for 12 months under rainfed conditions on a sandy-loam soil and no fertilizer or herbicide was applied
- TME 204 as susceptible control
- Albert from Tanzania
- Kibaha and TME 204 from Uganda
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!