Metaphase FISH was carried out on cases 2, 3, and 4 according to standard methods, with a total of 17–35 cells captured for each analysis. All whole chromosome paint FISH probes were acquired from Applied Spectral Imaging (Carlsbad, CA), and locus-specific probes from Vysis (Abbot Laboratories, Chicago, IL). FISH analysis was performed as follows: slides from case 2 were hybridized with whole chromosome paint probes for chromosomes 1 (Aqua – blue), 6 (Cy3 – red), and 21 (FITC – green); for case 3, whole chromosome paint probes for chromosomes 1 (FITC) and 16 (Aqua) were used together with a telomeric probe for 16q (Cy3); and for case 4, one analysis was performed with whole chromosome paint probes for chromosomes 3 (FITC) and 6 (Cy3), and another analysis for chromosome 14 (Aqua) together with a LSI TRA/D (14q11.2) break-apart dual colour probe (Cy3/FITC).
Analyzing Sister Chromatid Cohesion in HeH ALL
Metaphase FISH was carried out on cases 2, 3, and 4 according to standard methods, with a total of 17–35 cells captured for each analysis. All whole chromosome paint FISH probes were acquired from Applied Spectral Imaging (Carlsbad, CA), and locus-specific probes from Vysis (Abbot Laboratories, Chicago, IL). FISH analysis was performed as follows: slides from case 2 were hybridized with whole chromosome paint probes for chromosomes 1 (Aqua – blue), 6 (Cy3 – red), and 21 (FITC – green); for case 3, whole chromosome paint probes for chromosomes 1 (FITC) and 16 (Aqua) were used together with a telomeric probe for 16q (Cy3); and for case 4, one analysis was performed with whole chromosome paint probes for chromosomes 3 (FITC) and 6 (Cy3), and another analysis for chromosome 14 (Aqua) together with a LSI TRA/D (14q11.2) break-apart dual colour probe (Cy3/FITC).
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Lund University, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Skåne University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Charles University
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Percentage of cells with cohesion defects, measured as visible primary constriction gaps (gaps between the sister chromatids at the centromeres)
- None explicitly mentioned
- Positive control: None mentioned
- Negative control: None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!