Expanding E. coli Virulence Database
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Technical University of Denmark, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, University of Minnesota, Statens Serum Institut
Protocol cited in 14 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Database construction methodology (identifying candidate genes based on existing definitions and expert recommendations)
- Validation of the revised VirulenceFinder database by comparing in silico predicted virulence genes with PCR-based virulence genotyping results for control strains
- Comparison of in silico predicted virulence genes with PCR-based virulence genotyping results for 288 clinical and fecal strains classified as ExPEC vs. non-ExPEC
- Comparison of WGS-based pathotype classifications (ExPEC vs. non-ExPEC and UPEC vs. non-UPEC) for the 288 strains
- The nine control strains used for the initial validation
- The 288 clinical and fecal strains that had been previously classified as ExPEC vs. non-ExPEC
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!