GRS were calculated using the same method as presented by Ananthakrishnan et al. Risk alleles as well as their log odds ratios of association with disease were identified from Jostins et al. Each allele was then assigned a weight, with wild type as 0, heterozygous as 1 and homozygous as 2. The overall GRS was the summation of the weighted contribution of each risk allele calculated as Σ [log(odds ratio) × allele weight (0,1,2)]. Missing data on allele genotype were counted as wild type. Unlike Ananthakrishnan et al., we elected to keep GRS as a continuous variable for our analyses rather than arbitrarily dividing it into quartiles. Our Immunochip covers 151 of the 163 risk alleles described by Jostins et al. (14 (link)). The list of genes and their odds ratios is included in
Genetic Risk Score Calculation Protocol
GRS were calculated using the same method as presented by Ananthakrishnan et al. Risk alleles as well as their log odds ratios of association with disease were identified from Jostins et al. Each allele was then assigned a weight, with wild type as 0, heterozygous as 1 and homozygous as 2. The overall GRS was the summation of the weighted contribution of each risk allele calculated as Σ [log(odds ratio) × allele weight (0,1,2)]. Missing data on allele genotype were counted as wild type. Unlike Ananthakrishnan et al., we elected to keep GRS as a continuous variable for our analyses rather than arbitrarily dividing it into quartiles. Our Immunochip covers 151 of the 163 risk alleles described by Jostins et al. (14 (link)). The list of genes and their odds ratios is included in
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of Calgary
Variable analysis
- Genetic risk score (GRS)
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!