Consensus-Based CT Atlas for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy
Contrast-enhanced CT images were obtained for one healthy 42-year-old male volunteer in treatment position with inspiration breath-holding in July 2014. CT imaging was performed using a multidetector CT scanner (Aquilion LB; Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan) with 16 detector rows. The volunteer received 110 ml of iohexol (Omnipaque, 300 mgI/ml, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan) intravenously by means of power injector; the injection duration was 50 s. The scan duration was 80 s after the start of the injection. The parameters used in CT imaging were as follows: the field of view was 55 cm, the tube-current was 300 mA, and the tube-voltage was 120 kVp. The beam pitch was 0.8, and auto-exposure control was not used. The images were imported into a 3D radiotherapy treatment planning system (RTPS) (EclipseTM Treatment Planning System ver. 10.0; Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The lymph node stations were initially contoured on CT images in the RTPS as regions of interest (based on IASLC definitions) by a radiation oncologist who belongs to the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG). Subsequently, a project group was established by JROSG in October 2014. This group consisted of six additional radiation oncologists, a thoracic radiologist and a thoracic surgeon. All of the contoured CT images were revised, and tentative definitions for the boundaries of lymph node Stations 1–11 in six directions (cranial, caudal, left, right, anterior and posterior) were assigned by the JROSG project group as a draft of the atlas. Finally, a JLCS–JASTRO joint committee, which consisted of four radiation oncologists, four thoracic surgeons and three thoracic radiologists, was established to revise the draft. The committee held four conferences (in December 2014, and February, April and June 2015) and proposed a consensus-based CT atlas for defining the regional lymph node stations in radiotherapy for lung cancer. This atlas was approved by the Board of Directors of JASTRO in June 2015 and by the Board of Directors of JLCS in July 2015.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Itazawa T., Tamaki Y., Komiyama T., Nishimura Y., Nakayama Y., Ito H., Ohde Y., Kusumoto M., Sakai S., Suzuki K., Watanabe H, & Asamura H. (2017). The Japan Lung Cancer Society–Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology consensus-based computed tomographic atlas for defining regional lymph node stations in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Journal of Radiation Research, 58(1), 86-105.
Corresponding Organization : Japanese Society of Medical Oncology
Other organizations :
Shimane University, University of Yamanashi, Kindai University, Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization, Shizuoka Cancer Center, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Juntendo University, National Cancer Center, Keio University
CT images of the healthy 42-year-old male volunteer in the treatment position with inspiration breath-holding
control variables
Contrast agent (110 ml of iohexol, 300 mgI/ml)
Injection duration (50 s)
Scan duration (80 s after the start of the injection)
Multidetector CT scanner (Aquilion LB; Toshiba Medical Systems)
Number of detector rows (16)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required