For RNA-seq, the construction of libraries was generated using QuantSeq 3′ mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit (Lexogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. High-throughput sequencing was performed as single-end 75 sequencing using NextSeq 500 (Illumina). Each sample was analyzed at the University of Michigan Advanced Genomics Core. Data were aligned using the STAR aligner and featureCounts v1.6.4 software, and reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped read values on gene level were estimated for ensemble transcriptome (Dobin et al., 2013 (link); Liao et al., 2014 (link)). DESeq2 was used to estimate significance between any two experimental groups (Love et al., 2014 (link)). Principal component analysis was performed on the RNA-seq data to visualize sample-to-sample variance. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 (Jiao et al., 2012 (link)).
RNA Isolation and Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis
For RNA-seq, the construction of libraries was generated using QuantSeq 3′ mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit (Lexogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. High-throughput sequencing was performed as single-end 75 sequencing using NextSeq 500 (Illumina). Each sample was analyzed at the University of Michigan Advanced Genomics Core. Data were aligned using the STAR aligner and featureCounts v1.6.4 software, and reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped read values on gene level were estimated for ensemble transcriptome (Dobin et al., 2013 (link); Liao et al., 2014 (link)). DESeq2 was used to estimate significance between any two experimental groups (Love et al., 2014 (link)). Principal component analysis was performed on the RNA-seq data to visualize sample-to-sample variance. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 (Jiao et al., 2012 (link)).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Wuhan University
Variable analysis
- Experimental group vs. control group
- Gene expression levels measured by qPCR
- Gene expression levels measured by RNA-seq
- Housekeeping gene GAPDH for qPCR
- Wild-type and DKO cells for transcriptional profiling
- Positive control: Confirmed equivalent expression of GAPDH in wild-type and DKO cells
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!