Free-floating sections were blocked with 10% normal goat serum (NGS; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 10 min. Primary antibodies were diluted in 0.1M PBS containing 10% NGS and 0.1% triton x-100 and used at the following concentrations: rabbit anti-human glial fibrillary acidic protein 1:200 (GFAP; Abcam, Cambridge, MA); mouse anti-human nestin 1:100 (Abcam); mouse anti-human cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1:100 (CNPase; Millipore, Temecula, CA); mouse anti-human nuclei 1:100 (Acris Antibodies, Germany); and mouse anti-rat GFAP 1:300 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). Secondary antibodies (1:1000; Invitrogen) included: goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor (488 or 568 nm) or goat anti-mouse AlexaFluor (488 or 555 nm). Sections were air-dried and coverslipped with VectaShield anti-fade mounting media (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Slides were stored at 4°C and immunolabeled slides were scanned on a confocal microscope (BioRad 1024). Z-series of 10–12 images were collected by stepping through ~1μm sections for each tissue.
Immunohistochemical Characterization of Brain Tissue
Free-floating sections were blocked with 10% normal goat serum (NGS; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 10 min. Primary antibodies were diluted in 0.1M PBS containing 10% NGS and 0.1% triton x-100 and used at the following concentrations: rabbit anti-human glial fibrillary acidic protein 1:200 (GFAP; Abcam, Cambridge, MA); mouse anti-human nestin 1:100 (Abcam); mouse anti-human cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1:100 (CNPase; Millipore, Temecula, CA); mouse anti-human nuclei 1:100 (Acris Antibodies, Germany); and mouse anti-rat GFAP 1:300 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). Secondary antibodies (1:1000; Invitrogen) included: goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor (488 or 568 nm) or goat anti-mouse AlexaFluor (488 or 555 nm). Sections were air-dried and coverslipped with VectaShield anti-fade mounting media (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Slides were stored at 4°C and immunolabeled slides were scanned on a confocal microscope (BioRad 1024). Z-series of 10–12 images were collected by stepping through ~1μm sections for each tissue.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Loma Linda University
Other organizations : Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute
Variable analysis
- Time (90d)
- Staining for SPIO containing cells
- Immunolabeling with antibodies against GFAP, nestin, CNPase, human nuclei, and rat GFAP
- Transcardial perfusion
- Brain tissue collection and processing
- Staining protocol
- Antibody concentrations
- Mounting media
- Microscopy technique
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!