Mouse Experiments for Psychiatric Research

The animal experiments were approved by local authorities and conducted according to current regulations for animal experimentation in Germany and the European Union (European Communities Council Directive 2010/63/EU). Three-week-old, male B6 mice (n = 15, C57BL/6N, Martinsried, Germany) and DBA mice (n = 15, DBA/2, Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) were purchased and housed in groups of three for 11 weeks at the animal facility of the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry under standard conditions as previously described [35 (link)].

Free full text: Click here

Filiou M.D., Nussbaumer M., Teplytska L, & Turck C.W. (2021). Behavioral and Metabolome Differences between C57BL/6 and DBA/2 Mouse Strains: Implications for Their Use as Models for Depression- and Anxiety-Like Phenotypes. Metabolites, 11(2), 128.

Publication 2021

DBA/2

Animal Dba mice Male Mice River

Corresponding Organization : Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Mouse strain (B6 mice vs. DBA mice)

dependent variables

Unspecified

control variables

Age of mice (3-week-old)
Sex of mice (male)
Housing conditions (groups of three, standard conditions)
Facility (Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry)

controls

Positive control: Not specified
Negative control: Not specified

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!