Duplicates of each sample were pooled together, and RNA was extracted using the standard procedure of the RNeasy plant minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), resulting in two replicated RNA extractions per sample that were sent for sequencing to BaseClear (Leiden, The Netherlands). There, mRNA was enriched by poly(A) purification capture, and cDNA libraries were prepared using TruSeq RNA library preparation kits. The cDNA library was sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 system, producing two replicated raw datasets of first-stranded (or reverse), 50 bp, single-end reads.
Macrophage Confrontation Assay for Mutant Fungal Spores
Duplicates of each sample were pooled together, and RNA was extracted using the standard procedure of the RNeasy plant minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), resulting in two replicated RNA extractions per sample that were sent for sequencing to BaseClear (Leiden, The Netherlands). There, mRNA was enriched by poly(A) purification capture, and cDNA libraries were prepared using TruSeq RNA library preparation kits. The cDNA library was sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 system, producing two replicated raw datasets of first-stranded (or reverse), 50 bp, single-end reads.
Corresponding Organization : Universidad de Murcia
Other organizations : Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universidad Rovira i Virgili
Variable analysis
- Spores from mutant strain mcwc-1a∆
- Spores from the wild type R7B
- Host-pathogen interaction
- Gene expression (measured through RNA sequencing)
- Confrontation vs. non-confrontation (saprotrophic) conditions
- Culture medium (L15 supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum)
- Temperature (37 °C)
- Duration of confrontation (5 hours)
- Sample preparation (quadruplicates)
- Positive control: Confrontation of spores with mouse macrophage cell line (J774A.1 or ATCC TIB-67)
- Negative control: Culturing spores in L15 medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum (saprotrophic conditions)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!