One of the most often employed validated coping measures is the Brief COPE inventory instrument which was uploaded as a supplementary material as part of the data collection tool of this study. The Brief COPE inventory instrument was created by Professor Charles Carver at the University of Miami. It is a 28-item questionnaire with 14 different scales for chronic disease stress (2 questions per category). Active coping, planning, positive reframing, acceptance, humor, religion, emotional support, and instrumental assistance are among the eight adaptive coping mechanism subscales. Additionally, it includes six unhealthy coping mechanisms, including self-distraction, denial, venting, substance abuse, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame.24 Due to the fact that this study solely focused on the MCS, it only utilized the tool’s maladaptive component. Each item was measured on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (I do not do this at all) to 4 (I do this a lot). Higher scores indicated greater usage of that coping strategy, which was determined by adding the results of each sub-scale separately. This scale was validated using a pre-test at Felege Hiwot referral hospital. The items’ reliability was checked by calculating Cronbach’s alpha value (0.78).
Amharic Questionnaire for Glaucoma Patients' MCS
One of the most often employed validated coping measures is the Brief COPE inventory instrument which was uploaded as a supplementary material as part of the data collection tool of this study. The Brief COPE inventory instrument was created by Professor Charles Carver at the University of Miami. It is a 28-item questionnaire with 14 different scales for chronic disease stress (2 questions per category). Active coping, planning, positive reframing, acceptance, humor, religion, emotional support, and instrumental assistance are among the eight adaptive coping mechanism subscales. Additionally, it includes six unhealthy coping mechanisms, including self-distraction, denial, venting, substance abuse, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame.24 Due to the fact that this study solely focused on the MCS, it only utilized the tool’s maladaptive component. Each item was measured on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (I do not do this at all) to 4 (I do this a lot). Higher scores indicated greater usage of that coping strategy, which was determined by adding the results of each sub-scale separately. This scale was validated using a pre-test at Felege Hiwot referral hospital. The items’ reliability was checked by calculating Cronbach’s alpha value (0.78).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Gondar
Variable analysis
- Socio-demographic characteristics
- MCS in glaucoma patients
- Related factors
- MCS in glaucoma patients
- Keeping the study overseen by one MSc optometrist and one principal investigator to ensure valid results
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!