In each center, the patients had a systematic screening for ESBL Enterobacterales at ICU admission and at least once a week [21 (link),22 (link)]. No systematic screening for other MDR organism carriage was performed. A patient was considered colonized if one of these microorganisms was isolated from their screening sample (perirectal area, nose, any screening sample, or any sample performed because of clinical symptoms).
Screening for High-Risk Pathogens in ICU Patients
In each center, the patients had a systematic screening for ESBL Enterobacterales at ICU admission and at least once a week [21 (link),22 (link)]. No systematic screening for other MDR organism carriage was performed. A patient was considered colonized if one of these microorganisms was isolated from their screening sample (perirectal area, nose, any screening sample, or any sample performed because of clinical symptoms).
Corresponding Organization : Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Other organizations : Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital Foch, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Essonne Dourdan-Etampes, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Hôpital André Mignot, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Groupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy Montfermeil, Université Grenoble Alpes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, University of Geneva
Variable analysis
- Screening for ESBL Enterobacterales at ICU admission and at least once a week
- Colonization with high-risk pathogens (MRSA, ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, AmpC-overexpressing Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ticarcillin, imipenem, and/or ceftazidime, Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), and carbapenem-resistant and carbapenemase-producing non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria)
- No systematic screening for other MDR organism carriage was performed
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the information provided.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!