Overlaps are retrieved from the eFORGE database for each analyzable probe in the input set. The tool records a count of total hotspot overlaps for each DNase I sample (cell) for the test probe set. eFORGE selects 1,000 matching background probe sets that contain an equal number of probes to the test probe set, matching for gene annotation and CpG island annotation as described above. Retrieval of overlaps from the database for each of the probes in each of the background probe sets then occurs. The tool records an overlap count for each background set in each DNase I sample. For each test probe set, eFORGE obtains the binomial p value for the test set overlap count. This binomial p value is calculated for the test set overlap count relative to the total number of tested probe sets. The binomial test was chosen over the hypergeometric test due to the important computational speed advantages it offers, which are further highlighted considering the high number of tests performed by eFORGE.
Analyzing Differential Methylation Profiles
Overlaps are retrieved from the eFORGE database for each analyzable probe in the input set. The tool records a count of total hotspot overlaps for each DNase I sample (cell) for the test probe set. eFORGE selects 1,000 matching background probe sets that contain an equal number of probes to the test probe set, matching for gene annotation and CpG island annotation as described above. Retrieval of overlaps from the database for each of the probes in each of the background probe sets then occurs. The tool records an overlap count for each background set in each DNase I sample. For each test probe set, eFORGE obtains the binomial p value for the test set overlap count. This binomial p value is calculated for the test set overlap count relative to the total number of tested probe sets. The binomial test was chosen over the hypergeometric test due to the important computational speed advantages it offers, which are further highlighted considering the high number of tests performed by eFORGE.
Corresponding Organization : University College London
Other organizations : Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Imperial College London, Queen Mary University of London, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Sanger Institute, British Heart Foundation, NHS Blood and Transplant, National Health Service, University of Cambridge, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, McGill University, McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Kiel University, Universität Ulm, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Radboud University Nijmegen
Protocol cited in 22 other protocols
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Overlap count for each DNase I sample
- Probe selection criteria (minimum 20, maximum 1,000 probes)
- 1 kb proximity filter to avoid testing closely located CpGs
- Matching background probe sets (1,000) for gene annotation and CpG island annotation
- None mentioned
- None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!