Written informed consent to collect surveillance samples and resident-specific data was obtained from each resident or his or her durable power of attorney. Inclusion criteria were (1) any short-stay or long-stay resident with an indwelling urinary catheter, a feeding tube (nasogastric or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube), or both for more than 72 hours and (2) informed consent. Residents receiving end-of-life care were excluded. Study personnel (B.L., S.E.M., J.F., and E.K.) obtained data on participant characteristics, age, sex, functional status,28 (link) comorbidity,29 (link) and facility-level predictors, such as the quality ratings.30 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services created the 5-star quality rating system to help consumers, their families, and caregivers compare NHs. This rating incorporates health inspections, staffing, and quality measures. While the field staff (B.L., S.E.M., J.F., and E.K.) were aware of the intervention assignment, one of us (K.S.) processing microbiology cultures was blinded.
Evaluating Infection Prevention Strategies in Nursing Homes
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Michigan Medicine, University of Miami, Mercy Health System
Protocol cited in 6 other protocols
Variable analysis
- TIP intervention (preemptive barrier precautions, active surveillance for MDROs and infections with data feedback, and NH staff education on key infection prevention practices and hand hygiene promotion)
- Rates of MDRO colonization and infection
- Resident characteristics (age, sex, functional status, comorbidity)
- Facility-level predictors (quality ratings)
- Control group NHs continued to practice according to their own infection prevention policies
- Residents receiving end-of-life care were excluded
- Field staff (B.L., S.E.M., J.F., and E.K.) were aware of the intervention assignment, but one of the researchers (K.S.) processing microbiology cultures was blinded
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!