Preoperatively pre-anesthetic evaluation information regarding any history of URTI, type of surgery, investigations, history of POST, and any pertinent physical examination were recorded. Written informed consent was obtained just before anesthesia from the study participant’s family. Intraoperatively airway technique used, type of airway material used, number of attempts, any difficulty during airway instrumentation, and any bleeding on airway equipment on extubation were recorded. Any intraoperative airway incidents such as accidental extubation and reintubation were recorded. Postoperatively duration of surgery and anesthesia, any incident during extubation such as coughing, laryngospasm, vomiting, and stridor were recorded. After the patient was discharged from Operation Theater; the presence or absence of POST was assessed by the data collector with yes or no questions. Children who documented suffering from a sore throat at any point since waking up went on to complete a more detailed questionnaire regarding the severity of POST. The severity of postoperative sore throat was assessed by a four-point categorical pain scale, where 0 = for no sore throat; 1 = mild (complains of sore throat only after asking); 2 = moderate (complains of sore throat on his/her own); 3 = severe (change of voice associated with throat pain).10 (link),20 ,21 (link)
Postoperative Sore Throat Assessment in Pediatric Surgery
Preoperatively pre-anesthetic evaluation information regarding any history of URTI, type of surgery, investigations, history of POST, and any pertinent physical examination were recorded. Written informed consent was obtained just before anesthesia from the study participant’s family. Intraoperatively airway technique used, type of airway material used, number of attempts, any difficulty during airway instrumentation, and any bleeding on airway equipment on extubation were recorded. Any intraoperative airway incidents such as accidental extubation and reintubation were recorded. Postoperatively duration of surgery and anesthesia, any incident during extubation such as coughing, laryngospasm, vomiting, and stridor were recorded. After the patient was discharged from Operation Theater; the presence or absence of POST was assessed by the data collector with yes or no questions. Children who documented suffering from a sore throat at any point since waking up went on to complete a more detailed questionnaire regarding the severity of POST. The severity of postoperative sore throat was assessed by a four-point categorical pain scale, where 0 = for no sore throat; 1 = mild (complains of sore throat only after asking); 2 = moderate (complains of sore throat on his/her own); 3 = severe (change of voice associated with throat pain).10 (link),20 ,21 (link)
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Dilla University, Hawassa University
Protocol cited in 1 other protocol
Variable analysis
- History of URTI (Upper Respiratory Tract Infection)
- Type of surgery
- History of POST (Postoperative Sore Throat)
- Airway technique used
- Type of airway material used
- Number of attempts during airway instrumentation
- Difficulty during airway instrumentation
- Bleeding on airway equipment on extubation
- Intraoperative airway incidents (accidental extubation and reintubation)
- Presence or absence of POST
- Severity of POST (assessed by a four-point categorical pain scale)
- Duration of surgery and anesthesia
- Extubation incidents (coughing, laryngospasm, vomiting, stridor)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!