Prospective assessment included 2–4 cycles of daily DRSP ratings. Participants noted daily events they believed to have impacted daily mood; days in which participants reported the occurrence of a severe stressor not caused by symptoms were coded as missing. Participants mailed in forms weekly. In the final sample, 200 women provided at least two cycles. Eighty-five percent of women who dropped out after 1 cycle had not met C-PASS PMDD criteria in the first cycle. In women with >= 2 cycles, missing days were minimal (3.4%); just 1% of daily data were missing due to external events. Expert diagnoses (coauthor DR) of MRMD made prior to the development of the C-PASS (on the basis of identical data) were available for the majority of our sample (193 women; 96.5%). Because the DRSP summed total score demonstrates inadequate reliability of change17 , descriptive statistics for single items are considered.
Prospective Assessment of Premenstrual Symptoms
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Heidelberg University, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Protocol cited in 14 other protocols
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Degree of premenstrual increase in each of 21 symptoms (reported retrospectively on a 4-point Likert scale)
- Daily DRSP ratings (prospective assessment)
- Age (M = 32.70, SD = 8.21)
- Regular menstrual cycles (21-35 days)
- Exclusion of women with chronic medical disorders, histories of mania, substance dependence, or psychosis, any current SCID-I diagnosis, and certain medications (antidepressants, benzodiazepines, neuroleptics, or hormonal preparations)
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!