Assessing Cognitive Functions in Diverse Populations

Participants completed an NP test battery of which a subset of two memory and two executive function tests were examined for this study, because these tests lacked race/ethnicity corrections as compared to other tests in the battery. Trained psychometrists following instructions from the respective manuals completed administration and scoring. Analyzed measures included Form A of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (Brandt & Benedict, 2001 ), Display A from the Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised (Benedict, 1997 ), the Stroop Color-Word Interference Test (Golden, 1978 ), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 Computer Version (Heaton, Chelune, Talley, Kay, & Curtiss, 1993 ). We evaluated Total Recall across three learning trials and Delayed Recall for the HVLT-R and BVMT-R. Additionally, total numbers of correct items identified with the 45-second trials were analyzed for StroopWord Reading, Color Naming, and Color-Word formats. For the WCST, scores analyzed included Total Errors, Perseverative Errors, and Conceptual Level Responses.

Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link: Access Free Full Text.

Norman M.A., Moore D.J., Taylor M., Franklin D J.r., Cysique L., Ake C., Lazarretto D., Vaida F, & Heaton R.K. (2011). Demographically Corrected Norms for African Americans and Caucasians on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, Stroop Color and Word Test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-Card Version. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 33(7), 793-804.

Publication 2011

Ethnicity Executive function Memory Recall Stroop test Visual test

Corresponding Organization : University of California, San Diego

Other organizations : San Diego State University, UNSW Sydney

Top 5 similar protocols

Protocol cited in 22 other protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

None explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

Total Recall across three learning trials for the HVLT-R and BVMT-R
Delayed Recall for the HVLT-R and BVMT-R
Total numbers of correct items identified with the 45-second trials for StroopWord Reading, Color Naming, and Color-Word formats
Total Errors, Perseverative Errors, and Conceptual Level Responses for the WCST

control variables

Participants completed an NP test battery
A subset of two memory and two executive function tests were examined for this study
Tests lacked race/ethnicity corrections as compared to other tests in the battery
Trained psychometrists following instructions from the respective manuals completed administration and scoring

positive controls

None mentioned

negative controls

None mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!