From January 2010 to May 2018, a total of 2844 patients were diagnosed with GC at Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, in Busan, Korea. Of these, 537 patients were excluded based on the following exclusion criteria: (i) patients who were diagnosed with other diseases such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), carcinoid tumor, schwannoma, and leiomyosarcoma, and (ii) patients whose pathologic data were not available (n = 500). Among them, 88 (3.8%) and 2219 (96.2%) patients were ≤40 and >40 years of age, respectively. To evaluate the long‐term follow‐up outcomes and compare patients younger and older than 40 years, we divided the patients into younger (≤40 years, n = 70) and older (>40 years, n = 70) age groups by propensity matching. We excluded eight patients meeting the following exclusion criteria: (i) no available clinical data or clinical records, (ii) gastric metastasis due to other primary‐originated cancer, and (iii) no pathological findings. In the propensity‐matching analysis, the covariates included gender and treatment modality. In summary, the propensity analysis included a total of 132 matched patients, including 70 younger and 62 older patients, diagnosed with GC between 2010 and 2018, who were included in further analyses of pathologic findings and outcomes (Fig. 1). This study was conducted under the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review board of Haeundae Paik Hospital.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Kim Y.H., Jung Y.M., Park T.Y., Jeong S.J., Kim T.H., Lee J., Park J., Kim T.O, & Park Y.E. (2023). Comparisons of pathologic findings and outcomes of gastric cancer patients younger and older than 40: a propensity score matching study in a single center of Korea. JGH Open: An Open Access Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 7(2), 118-127.
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required