Anthropometric and Body Composition Assessment

Anthropometric measures included body height (Martin metal anthropometer, Switzerland) and body mass (A&D Instruments Ltd., Abingdon, UK). BMI was also calculated (kg.m⁻²). Whole body and lower body region (WB BMD and lower limbs BMD, g.cm⁻²), bone mineral density and bone mineral content for the whole body (WB BMC, g) were assessed via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic Discovery QDR Series, Waltham, MA, USA) [29 (link),30 (link)].

Free full text: Click here

Salus M., Tillmann V., Remmel L., Unt E., Mäestu E., Parm Ü., Mägi A., Tali M, & Jürimäe J. (2023). Serum Osteocalcin, Sclerostin and Lipocalin-2 Levels in Adolescent Boys with Obesity over a 12-Week Sprint Interval Training. Children, 10(5), 850.

Publication 2023

Martin metal anthropometer QDR Series

Body Body height Body region Bone mineral density Lower limbs Metal

Corresponding Organization : University of Tartu

Other organizations : Tartu University Hospital

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

None explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

Body height
Body mass
Whole body bone mineral density (WB BMD)
Lower body region bone mineral density (lower limbs BMD)
Whole body bone mineral content (WB BMC)

control variables

None explicitly mentioned

controls

No positive or negative controls were specified by the authors.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!