An MRI scoring tool adapted from Kidokoro et al.18 (link) was used, which combines quantitative and qualitative measurements of brain abnormalities in preterm infants at TEA. The quantitative scoring included: dilated lateral ventricles dimensions (score 0 to 3), biparietal diameter (corrected to the GA, scored 0 to 3), interhemispheric distance (score 0 to 3), deep gray matter volume (corrected to the GA, scored 0 to 3), and cerebellar volume (corrected to the GA and scored 0 to 3). Qualitative scoring included: white matter cystic lesions, white matter focal signal abnormality, myelination delay, cortical gray matter signal abnormality, gyral maturation, deep gray matter signal abnormality, and cerebellar signal abnormality. The variables were scored by an experienced reader (AMM) blinded to the clinical information of the patients and the corresponding aEEG measures. The abnormality scoring system was divided into four grades: normal (0 to 3), mild (4 to 7), moderate (8 to 11), and severe (> 12), for the preterm brain at TEA.
Quantitative Neonatal Brain MRI Scoring System
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Washington University in St. Louis
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Dilated lateral ventricles dimensions
- Biparietal diameter (corrected to the GA)
- Interhemispheric distance
- Deep gray matter volume (corrected to the GA)
- Cerebellar volume (corrected to the GA)
- White matter cystic lesions
- White matter focal signal abnormality
- Myelination delay
- Cortical gray matter signal abnormality
- Gyral maturation
- Deep gray matter signal abnormality
- Cerebellar signal abnormality
- None explicitly mentioned
- Positive controls: None mentioned
- Negative controls: None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!