Metabolic, Clinical, and Thyroid Differences in MDD with Suicidal Attempts

We assessed differences in metabolic disturbances, clinical symptoms, and thyroid dysfunction between MDD patients with and without SA by chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Whitney U test, as appropriate. Bonferroni correction was employed for multiple testing (p’=0.05/40 = 0.00125). A multiple logistic regression model was conducted to identify independent correlates of SA. Variables with P < 0.05 in univariate tests were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis using the stepwise method.

Free full text: Click here

Peng P., Wang Q., Lang X., Liu T, & Zhang X.Y. (2023). Clinical symptoms, thyroid dysfunction, and metabolic disturbances in first-episode drug-naïve major depressive disorder patients with suicide attempts: A network perspective. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14, 1136806.

Publication 2023

Patients Thyroid

Corresponding Organization : University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Other organizations : First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Presence of Suicide Attempts (SA)

dependent variables

Metabolic disturbances
Clinical symptoms
Thyroid dysfunction

control variables

Bonferroni correction was employed for multiple testing (p'=0.05/40 = 0.00125)

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!