Principal component analysis showed a large variability between replicate samples. Two factors of unwanted variation were removed using the RUVs function (R package RUVSeq v. 1.10.047 (link)). Differential expression between knock-out and wild-type was computed using limma48 (link). A linear model with a factor for each combination of time point and genotyope was used. Factors to correct for batch effect and unwanted variation were also added in the design matrix. Differences in gene expression levels between KO and WT animals at each time points were combined into one F-test. Genes with a false discovery rate <5% were considered significant. The limma function ‘classifyTestsF’ was used to classify time point as significant or not for the selected genes.
RNA-seq analysis of knock-out model
Principal component analysis showed a large variability between replicate samples. Two factors of unwanted variation were removed using the RUVs function (R package RUVSeq v. 1.10.047 (link)). Differential expression between knock-out and wild-type was computed using limma48 (link). A linear model with a factor for each combination of time point and genotyope was used. Factors to correct for batch effect and unwanted variation were also added in the design matrix. Differences in gene expression levels between KO and WT animals at each time points were combined into one F-test. Genes with a false discovery rate <5% were considered significant. The limma function ‘classifyTestsF’ was used to classify time point as significant or not for the selected genes.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Lausanne, University Hospital of Lausanne
Variable analysis
- Genotype (knock-out vs. wild-type)
- Gene expression levels
- Total RNA input (200 ng)
- Sequencing platform (Illumina TruSeq SR Cluster Kit v4)
- Computational pipeline (as described in Ref. 45)
- Reference genome (Mus musculus GRCm38.86)
- Statistical software (R version 3.4.0)
- Normalization method (TMM normalization and voom transformation)
- Batch effect and unwanted variation removal (RUVs)
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned.
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!