Major eligibility criteria for the study included best-corrected visual acuity at distance and near of 20/25 or better, no strabismus, heterophoria at near between 2Δ esophoria and 8Δ exophoria, near point of convergence closer than 6.0 cm break, negative fusional vergence at near greater than 7Δ BI-break and 5Δ BI-recovery, positive fusional vergence at near greater than 10Δ BO-break and 7Δ BO-recovery, monocular amplitude of accommodation in diopters greater than 15 minus 25% of the child’s age, and at least 500 seconds of arc of random dot stereopsis on the Randot® Stereotest (Stereo Optical Co, Chicago, IL). A refractive correction was required when the magnitude of uncorrected refractive error or change in refractive error (based on a cycloplegic refraction performed within 2 months) in either eye differed from the current prescription by 0.50 D or more in spherical equivalent of myopia, 1.50D or greater in spherical equivalent of hyperopia, or 0.75 D or greater of astigmatism.
Eligibility Criteria for Vision Study
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Marshall B. Ketchum University, The Ohio State University, Salus University, Nova Southeastern University
Protocol cited in 35 other protocols
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Best-corrected visual acuity at distance and near
- Cover testing at distance and near with objective prism neutralization
- Near point of convergence
- Positive and negative fusional vergence at near (fusional convergence and divergence amplitudes)
- Near stereoacuity
- Monocular accommodative amplitude
- Monocular accommodative facility
- Cycloplegic refraction with 1% cyclopentolate
- Ocular health evaluation
- CISS (Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey) score
- Eligibility criteria for study participants, including best-corrected visual acuity, absence of strabismus, heterophoria at near, near point of convergence, fusional vergence at near, monocular amplitude of accommodation, and stereo acuity
- Use of a standardized protocol for testing by CITT-trained and certified optometrists or ophthalmologists
- Masked examiners for performing the testing
- Unmasked examiner for eligibility testing
- Requirement for refractive correction if the magnitude of uncorrected refractive error or change in refractive error differs from the current prescription by certain thresholds
- Positive controls: None explicitly mentioned
- Negative controls: None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!