For all the gametocytes assays, RNA was extracted using the pathogen Nucleic Acid Extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and eluted in 50 μL elution buffer, i.e., RNA was concentrated two-fold during extraction. RNA samples were DNase treated (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) to remove genomic DNA that could result in a false positive pfs25 signal [43 (link)]. A subset of RNA samples was tested by varATS qPCR, and all tested negative.
Ultrasensitive malaria detection protocol
For all the gametocytes assays, RNA was extracted using the pathogen Nucleic Acid Extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and eluted in 50 μL elution buffer, i.e., RNA was concentrated two-fold during extraction. RNA samples were DNase treated (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) to remove genomic DNA that could result in a false positive pfs25 signal [43 (link)]. A subset of RNA samples was tested by varATS qPCR, and all tested negative.
Corresponding Organization : University of Notre Dame
Other organizations : Egerton University, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Maseno University, University of California, Irvine, Center for Global Health, Case Western Reserve University
Protocol cited in 1 other protocol
Variable analysis
- DNA extraction method (Genomic DNA Extraction kit, Macherey-Nagel)
- Presence/absence of P. falciparum infection (determined by ultrasensitive qPCR targeting varATS gene)
- Asexual parasite density (calculated from varATS copy numbers)
- Sample volume (100 μL blood)
- Elution volume (equivalent to sample volume)
- Positive control: External standard curve of 10-fold serial dilutions of 3D7 P. falciparum parasites quantified by ddPCR
- Negative control: Subset of RNA samples tested by varATS qPCR and found to be negative
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!