Prescription Quality Evaluation and Prescriber Analysis
The data management system is comprised of data entry, cleaning, back-up, and the generation of regular reports. Built-in quality control mechanisms were developed to ensure data quality and confidentiality. Prescriptions were analysed using the mentioned WHO indicators. Information was collected about the prescriber also in terms of their hierarchical designation, e.g., general resident doctors, post-graduate residents, and senior doctors (Medical officer/Demonstrator/Clinical Tutor, Assistant Professor, Associate Professor and Professor). A house staff is a junior resident who has completed undergraduate medical degree (MBBS) and internship but yet to join for a post graduate course. Faculty in clinical disciplines include Residential Medical Officer (RMO) cum Clinical Tutor, Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor. All have qualified with post-graduate medical degrees (MD). All the above proportions were compared across age groups (pediatric and adult) and different categories of prescribers. The prescriptions were assessed using a “Consensus Committee approach”.
Chakraborty D., Debnath F., Kanungo S., Mukhopadhyay S., Chakraborty N., Basu R., Das P., Datta K., Ganguly S., Banerjee P., Kshirsagar N, & Dutta S. (2023). Rationality of Prescriptions by Rational Use of Medicine Consensus Approach in Common Respiratory and Gastrointestinal Infections: An Outpatient Department Based Cross-Sectional Study from India. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 8(2), 88.
Corresponding Organization : National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases
Other organizations :
R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, College of Medicine & Sagore Dutta Hospital, West Bengal State Council of Technical Education, Indian Council of Medical Research
Proportions compared across different categories of prescribers
control variables
Built-in quality control mechanisms to ensure data quality and confidentiality
Prescriptions assessed using a "Consensus Committee approach"
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required