For functional tests, we adopted the Two-Step test and Stand-Up test. The Two-Step test, shown in Fig. 1a, which was previously examined by Muranaga et al. [9 ] has been developed as a screening tool for walking ability. The subject starts from the standing posture and moves two steps forward with maximum stride with the caution not to lose balance. If the subject succeeds in holding the final standing position longer than 3 s without any additional steps, the trial is judged as completed. The distance is then standardized by dividing it by the subject’s height. The test is performed twice, and the best result is recorded. Muranaga et al. [9 ]. reported that the value of the Two-Step test has a strong correlation with maximum walking speed. The Stand-Up test, shown in Fig. 1b, was also developed by Muranaga et al. [10 ] and is performed with stools of 10, 20, 30, and 40 cm in height. Subjects are requested to stand from each stool with one leg or two legs. If the subject succeeds in holding the final standing position longer than 3 s without any additional steps, the trial is judged as completed. A 0–8 score is allocated to the performance as shown in Table 1. Muranaga et al. [10 ] reported a significant correlation between the Stand-Up test score and the weight bearing index which is calculated as knee extension torque divided by body weight. To evaluate the reliability of these functional tests, we examined test–retest reproducibility. For that purpose, another 88 subjects were recruited and performed the Two-Step test and Stand-Up test two times each with 5–9 day intervals.
The schematic procedure of the Two-Step test (a), and Stand-Up test (b)
Scoring system of Stand-Up test
Two-leg stand
One-leg stand
Height
Fail at40 cm
40 cm
30 cm
20 cm
10 cm
40 cm
30 cm
20 cm
10 cm
Score
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
One-leg stand requires subjects to succeed at indicated height in both right and left leg
Ogata T., Muranaga S., Ishibashi H., Ohe T., Izumida R., Yoshimura N., Iwaya T, & Nakamura K. (2015). Development of a screening program to assess motor function in the adult population: a cross-sectional observational study. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 20(5), 888-895.
Other organizations :
National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Kameda Medical Center, NTT Medical Center, Edogawa Hospital, The University of Tokyo
Ability to stand from the stool (scored from 0 to 8)
Time to hold the final standing position (longer than 3 seconds)
control variables
Not explicitly mentioned
positive controls
Not mentioned
negative controls
Not mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required