We used Wagner parsimony implemented in the program Count111 (link) with a weighted gene gain penalty of 1.2 to reconstruct the ancestral gene content at key nodes in the phylogeny of the 23 land plants and green algae species (Supplementary Table
Comparative Evolutionary Genomics of Land Plants
We used Wagner parsimony implemented in the program Count111 (link) with a weighted gene gain penalty of 1.2 to reconstruct the ancestral gene content at key nodes in the phylogeny of the 23 land plants and green algae species (Supplementary Table
Corresponding Organization : Ithaca College
Other organizations : Utrecht University, Ghent University, Dalhousie University, Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, Université de Toulouse, Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Duke University, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, University of Arizona, California State University, Fullerton, ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, University of Western Australia, Pennsylvania State University, Bielefeld University, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, The University of Tokyo, VIB-UGent Center for Plant Systems Biology, Philipps University of Marburg, Utah State University, University of California, Berkeley, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, University of Pretoria, University of Alberta
Protocol cited in 15 other protocols
Variable analysis
- The OrthoFinder clustering method used to classify complete proteomes of 23 sequenced green plant genomes
- Orthogroups containing at least two genes that were circumscribed
- Percentage of annotated A. filiculoides and S. cucullata genes that were classified into orthogroups
- Ancestral gene content dynamics - gains, losses, expansions and contractions - at key nodes in the phylogeny of the 23 land plants and green algae species
- Control variables not explicitly mentioned
- No positive or negative controls were specified by the authors
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!