The scoring system for IHC staining was presented previously [16 (link)]. Staining intensity was divided into four grades: 0, none; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong. The percentage of specifically positive staining tumor cells was classified with the following grades: 0 (<5%), 1 (6%–25%), 2 (26%–50%), 3 (51%–75%), and 4 (>75%). The final score was expressed by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of specifically positive staining tumor cells.
Immunohistochemical Evaluation of EDG2 Expression
The scoring system for IHC staining was presented previously [16 (link)]. Staining intensity was divided into four grades: 0, none; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong. The percentage of specifically positive staining tumor cells was classified with the following grades: 0 (<5%), 1 (6%–25%), 2 (26%–50%), 3 (51%–75%), and 4 (>75%). The final score was expressed by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of specifically positive staining tumor cells.
Corresponding Organization : First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Variable analysis
- Primary rabbit monoclonal anti-human EDG2 antibody (ab166903, Abcam, UK) at 1:100 dilution
- Staining intensity
- Percentage of specifically positive staining tumor cells
- Specimen slides for IHC staining
- Methanol and 3% H2O2 for quenching peroxidase
- Citrate buffer for boiling sections
- Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for washing
- HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (ab6721; Abcam, UK) at 1:100 dilution
- Avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex for staining
- Diaminobenzidine for visualization
- Hematoxylin for counterstaining
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!