SNAP-IV Rating Scale for ADHD Diagnosis

The Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham-IV rating scale (SNAP-IV rating scale) rating scale has good reliability and validity (40 (link), 41 (link)). This scale is compiled according to the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD, with a total of 18 items that are summarized in two factors: attention deficit (items 1–9) and hyperactivity/impulsivity (items 10–18) were scored on a scale of 4 for symptom severity (none at all 0; A little bit is one point; Not too little is 2 points; and Very many are 3 points), selected by parents according to their children's general impression. The scores are on average.

Free full text: Click here

Wang Y.C., Liu J., Wu Y.C., Wei Y., Xie H.J., Zhang T, & Zhang Z. (2023). A randomized, sham-controlled trial of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation on the right orbital frontal cortex in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 987093.

Publication 2023

Adhd Attention deficit Diagnostic Parents

Corresponding Organization : Zhejiang University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

None explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

Severity of ADHD symptoms, including attention deficit and hyperactivity/impulsivity, as measured by the SNAP-IV rating scale

control variables

None explicitly mentioned

controls

No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the provided information.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!