The study was conducted at Midreshet Ben-Gurion in the northern Negev desert, Israel (30°51′8.27″N 34°47′0.24″E) from summer 2003 until autumn 2004. The study site was a complex of guest rooms surrounded by a two-meter high wall over an area 13x150m. A dense population of the Israeli fan-toed gecko Ptyodactylus guttatus inhabited the premises [30 –32 (link)]. The Israeli fan-toed gecko is a medium-sized, insectivorous, rupicolous, scansorial lizard [6 , 45 ] Zlotkin et al. 2003 [50 (link)], Sion et al. 2020 [33 (link)] in the family Phyllodactylidae [7 (link)] common in mesic and arid parts of the Middle East (Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Palestine, Jordan, and Syria). It often inhabits cliffs or masonry walls where it can easily be observed from a distance ([48 , 47 ], 2016 [6 , 15 (link), 30 –32 (link), 46 ]). Fifty-five geckos were hand captured, measured (morphometrics) and scanned (DXA) and released at the site of capture. Of these, 30 gecko’s scan data were included in the comparison, since their body mass was above the lowest possible accurate reading with minimal body mass (> 4.8 g) as indicated in the results (Table 1). The snout vent length (SVL) of these 30 geckos was 60.6–91.7 mm and their body mass 4.99–22.5 g. We used these 30 geckos to compare the real wet mass (as measured by a scale) and the wet mass measure by DXA (see below). From each captured gecko, we recorded the mass using Ohaus digital scale to 0.1 g precision, snout-vent length (SVL), using digital calipers, and the width at the base of the tail. Six additional individuals were captured and euthanized for the calibration necessary for this study (two males, three females and one too small to be sexed without a probe) The smallest gecko (55.6 mm) with body mass 4.2 g was excluded to improve accuracy from 55 to 8.5% error. The snout vent length (SVL) of these geckos was 61.5–91.7 mm and their body mass 4.8–11.5 g. We killed only six geckos in order to minimize destructive sampling as much as possible.
Sex, snout-vent length (SVL), live wet body mass, DXA mass reading and fat mass chemical extraction of six Israeli fan-toed geckos Ptyodactylus guttatus used to validate the application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to non-invasively calculate body fat indices in small lizards
Sex
SVL (mm)
Live Wet Mass (g)
DXA Mass Reading (g)
Fat Extraction (g)
DXA Fat Reading (g)
Male
61.51
4.8
5.7
0.26
1.5
Male
87.45
11
12
0.37
1.65
Female
80.74
10.9
11.9
1.60
2.4
Female
65.97
11.5
13
2.09
2.8
Female
67.14
6.5
7.6
0.93
2
Unknowna
55.64
4.2
5.2
0.43
0.95
a Indicates the lizard that was removed from the validation experiment (see text for details)
Sion G., Watson M.J, & Bouskila A. (2021). Measuring body condition of lizards: a comparison between non-invasive dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, chemical fat extraction and calculated indices. Frontiers in Zoology, 18, 1.
Morphometrics (snout-vent length, width at base of tail)
Body mass (real wet mass and DXA wet mass)
Body fat (fat mass extracted chemically and DXA fat reading)
control variables
Study site (complex of guest rooms surrounded by a two-meter high wall over an area 13x150m)
Population of Israeli fan-toed geckos (Ptyodactylus guttatus) inhabiting the premises
controls
Positive control: The 30 geckos with body mass above the lowest possible accurate reading with minimal body mass (> 4.8 g) were used to compare the real wet mass and the wet mass measured by DXA.
Negative control: The smallest gecko (55.6 mm) with body mass 4.2 g was excluded to improve accuracy from 55 to 8.5% error.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required