BLCA Tissue Comparison Protocol

The comparison of BLCA tissues with corresponding non-cancer tissues was carried out on 20 pairs of radical cystectomy patients in the general surgery department of the first Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (Nanchang, China) from September 2021 to September 2022.

Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link: Access Free Full Text.

Chen R., Jiang M., Hu B., Fu B, & Sun T. (2023). Comprehensive Analysis of the Expression, Prognosis, and Biological Significance of PLOD Family in Bladder Cancer. International Journal of General Medicine, 16, 707-722.

Publication 2023

Cancer Out patients Radical cystectomy Tissues

Corresponding Organization :

Other organizations : First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Central Hospital of Putuo District

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Comparison of BLCA tissues with corresponding non-cancer tissues

dependent variables

Measured outcomes

control variables

Radical cystectomy patients in the general surgery department of the first Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (Nanchang, China) from September 2021 to September 2022

controls

Positive controls not explicitly mentioned
Negative controls not explicitly mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!