Evaluating a Multidisciplinary Safety Plan Intervention
Mental health service multidisciplinary teams across both health care areas will be informed of the study and made aware of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Team members will be asked to identify patients who are eligible to participate and for whom a safety plan is clinically indicated. Mental health service professionals will inform potential participants about the study and invite them to meet the researcher. If the patient agrees, the researcher will approach the patient, provide them with a participant information sheet, and answer any questions they may have. If the patient agrees, informed consent will be obtained by the researcher. In consenting to participate, participants will also agree to the researcher accessing their medical file notes. Information on the semistructured interviews and fidelity assessment will also be provided, and consent to future contact for this purpose will be sought. Clinicians across both community health organizations will be invited to participate in semistructured interviews to discuss their experiences of delivering the intervention. Previously established clinician champions at each site will promote recruitment within their own teams and at weekly team meetings. Doctorate in clinical psychology students, in fulfillment of their clinical research experience and under the supervision of the principal investigator, will also support data collection across sites. Baseline assessment measures will be administered to eligible participants who have consented to participate. Following the baseline assessment, participants will be randomized (1:1) to either the SafePlan or control condition. An overview of the study procedures is provided in Figure 1.
Melia R., Francis K., Duggan J., Bogue J., O'Sullivan M., Young K., Chambers D., McInerney S.J., O'Dea E, & Bernert R. (2023). Using a Safety Planning Mobile App to Address Suicidality in Young People Attending Community Mental Health Services in Ireland: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 12, e44205.
Publication 2023
Fulfillment Health Health care teams Health professionals Mental health service PatientSafety StudentsSupervision
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
Health Service Executive, University of Limerick, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway, Stanford University
Outcomes measured through baseline assessment measures
control variables
Eligibility criteria for participants
Randomization of participants to SafePlan or control condition (1:1 ratio)
positive controls
Not explicitly mentioned
negative controls
Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required