We undertook a phase 3 randomised controlled trial at six UK radiotherapy centres (recruitment between Jan 21, 2003, and Dec 7, 2007). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed HNSCC that arose from the oropharynx or hypopharynx and were to be treated by radiotherapy either primarily or postoperatively without concomitant chemotherapy. These patients were at high risk of radiation-induced xerostomia—ie, if they were treated with conventional radiotherapy the estimated mean dose to both parotid glands would be greater than 24 Gy. Patients had WHO performance status 0 or 1 and any stage of disease except M1. Patients were required to attend regular follow-up, undergo salivary flow measurements, and complete self-assessed QoL questionnaires. Exclusion criteria included previous head or neck radiotherapy; previous malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer; pre-existing salivary gland disease; tumour involvement of the parotid glands; or previous or concurrent illness that would compromise completion of treatment or follow-up. Prophylactic amifostine or pilocarpine was not permitted. Patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. All patients provided written informed consent. PARSPORT (CRUK/03/005) was approved by the national South-West Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (MREC 03/6/79) and the local ethics committees of all participating centres. Our trial was sponsored by the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and undertaken in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice.
Nutting C.M., Morden J.P., Harrington K.J., Urbano T.G., Bhide S.A., Clark C., Miles E.A., Miah A.B., Newbold K., Tanay M., Adab F., Jefferies S.J., Scrase C., Yap B.K., A'Hern R.P., Sydenham M.A., Emson M, & Hall E. (2011). Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Oncology, 12(2), 127-136.
Other organizations :
Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Mount Vernon Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Ipswich Hospital, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Self-assessed Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires
control variables
Patients had histologically confirmed HNSCC that arose from the oropharynx or hypopharynx
Patients were to be treated by radiotherapy either primarily or postoperatively without concomitant chemotherapy
Patients were at high risk of radiation-induced xerostomia (estimated mean dose to both parotid glands would be greater than 24 Gy if treated with conventional radiotherapy)
Patients had WHO performance status 0 or 1 and any stage of disease except M1
Patients were required to attend regular follow-up, undergo salivary flow measurements, and complete self-assessed QoL questionnaires
Exclusion criteria included previous head or neck radiotherapy, previous malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer, pre-existing salivary gland disease, tumour involvement of the parotid glands, or previous or concurrent illness that would compromise completion of treatment or follow-up
Prophylactic amifostine or pilocarpine was not permitted
Patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required